<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dealing with Text Conflicts in Bazaar Version Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2007/06/05/dealing-with-conflicts-in-bazaar-version-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2007/06/05/dealing-with-conflicts-in-bazaar-version-control/</link>
	<description>the personal blog of Stuart Colville covering modern web development techniques and best practices</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz Gorski</title>
		<link>http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2007/06/05/dealing-with-conflicts-in-bazaar-version-control/#comment-48425</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Gorski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2007/06/05/dealing-with-conflicts-in-bazaar-version-control/#comment-48425</guid>
		<description>I found that: If we consider the users tree-id as base, the users current tree as this and the tree the undo was done against as other it would work : but we need to record the tree-id the undo was done against as part of the 'undo' process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that: If we consider the users tree-id as base, the users current tree as this and the tree the undo was done against as other it would work : but we need to record the tree-id the undo was done against as part of the &#8216;undo&#8217; process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
