<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving to Textpattern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/</link>
	<description>the personal blog of Stuart Colville covering modern web development techniques and best practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 15:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3DSL Eugen</title>
		<link>http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/comment-page-1/#comment-17812</link>
		<dc:creator>3DSL Eugen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/#comment-17812</guid>
		<description>Textpattern is a great blog software, but wordpress is more popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Textpattern is a great blog software, but wordpress is more popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Pitman</title>
		<link>http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Pitman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear you&#039;re taking a look at Textpattern. There&#039;s a free version of Expression Engine (pmachine.com) now too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear you&#8217;re taking a look at Textpattern. There&#8217;s a free version of Expression Engine (pmachine.com) now too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>@Nathan: Thanks for the suggestion, I will check out Expression Engine before I start to write the script to convert my db structure to the new one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nathan: Thanks for the suggestion, I will check out Expression Engine before I start to write the script to convert my db structure to the new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael</title>
		<link>http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Why did you chose Txp over Wordpress or other systems? What I don&#039;t like much about Txp is that you&#039;ve got to learn yet another templating language -tags- whereas with, say, Wordpress you can use plain PHP in your templates. From a developer perspective, last Txp version I checked was a pretty awful spaghetti code and I feared it could get difficult to extend (Wordpress isn&#039;t much better in this point, either).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you chose Txp over WordPress or other systems? What I don&#8217;t like much about Txp is that you&#8217;ve got to learn yet another templating language -tags- whereas with, say, WordPress you can use plain PHP in your templates. From a developer perspective, last Txp version I checked was a pretty awful spaghetti code and I feared it could get difficult to extend (WordPress isn&#8217;t much better in this point, either).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.muffinresearch.co.uk/archives/2005/12/16/moving-to-textpattern/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>@Ismael:Fair comments. For me the xml template method used doesn&#039;t strike me as too alien. I will be honest, as yet I haven&#039;t actually looked at the code but now you mentioned it I will take a peek. 

If you aren&#039;t too keen on Textpattern or Wordpress what&#039;s your recommendation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ismael:Fair comments. For me the xml template method used doesn&#8217;t strike me as too alien. I will be honest, as yet I haven&#8217;t actually looked at the code but now you mentioned it I will take a peek. </p>
<p>If you aren&#8217;t too keen on Textpattern or WordPress what&#8217;s your recommendation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

